logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.07.20 2012고단610
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Seoul Southern District Court on April 7, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 15, 2010.

On June 3, 2003, the actual name of the defendant was D (China Notarial No. S. E) and his accomplice F, who had been living in China in the name of D in the name of D in the name of D, and there was a dispute with G in any facility of the Anagu-ro, Seo-ro, China around June 3, 2003.

An accomplice is a person designated as a murderer in China due to a murder committed in the course of G as a beer's disease.

The Defendant, with knowledge of the fact of murder in Chinese airspace, forged a name A, No. Public Identification Number H, and then made a Chinese passport in a forged status, and entered Korea around May 6, 2006.

The defendant, after entering the Republic of Korea, applied for naturalization to the Ministry of Justice, which is a forged status, and obtained permission of naturalization on August 21, 2007 by the Ministry of Justice No. 589.

The Defendant, around September 21, 2007, at the Dong-dong Office of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 317-87, Dong-dong Office of Dong-dong, and the facts themselves are D and forged status, even if he obtained permission of naturalization as above, the public official in charge of issuing resident registration certificates who knows such facts, submitted the above permission of naturalization, etc. to the competent public official, and had the competent public official enter the contents of the above permission of naturalization, etc. in his family relation registration computer network.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false report to a public official, and made him record false facts in the family relation register which is the same public electronic record as that of the family relation register, and had him keep the family relation register computer network in which false facts are recorded.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness K in the court;

1. The second prosecutor's office against the defendant;

arrow