beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
○○○ (2 omitted) (Law Firm Han-gu et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The Minister of Justice
Conclusion of Pleadings
June 18, 2013
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 201Guhap38759 decided July 26, 2012
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The defendant's disposition of non-recognition of refugee status against the plaintiff on May 25, 2011 shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim seeking the cancellation of the disposition of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judicial Enforcement Decree of Judges (Presiding Judge)