beta
Text
1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and four months;
2. Defendant B is written 1 to 8 times a year in the list of annexed crimes.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On February 9, 2017, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution for a violation of the Trademark Act at the Seoul Central District Court, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 17, 2017.
1. Defendant A served from July 2, 2012 to February 28, 2017 as a security officer belonging to “G,” a station in charge of security duties at the workplace of the F-U.S. located in the Gu and the workplace of the F-U.S. located in the Gu and Si/Gun, from February 28, 2017.
On November 2014, 2014, the Defendant was kept in the first room located in FJ 2 Business Chapter H, Dong-dong 4, Dong-dong, the Defendant had been kept in such room.
J 10 smartphones were stolen with 253 smartphones in total (based on ex-factory price) equivalent to 240,300,000 won (based on ex-factory price) of the victim F Co., Ltd. from around 1 to February 22, 2017, including the theft of 10 smartphones by hiding them in clothes without undergoing security screening, etc.
2. On November 2014, Defendant B acquired stolen goods by paying KRW 100,000 or KRW 200,000 per unit of smartphone from A, even though he/she knew that the 10th cost of J smartphone 10,000, which he/she possessed, was stolen at two places of business in the Gu-U.S., F. 2, a corporation, as described in paragraph 1, and by purchasing KRW 100,000 per unit of smartphone from around that time to March 1, 2017, as shown in attached Table 2, from around that time to around March 2017, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing KRW 10,00 or KRW 20,000 per unit of business.
3. On November 2014, the Defendant purchased KRW 130,00 or KRW 180,00 per smartphone, even though he knows that the cost of 10,000 or KRW 1,00 per 1,00 or KRW 180,00 per 1,00,000,000 from the N phone sales store operated by the Defendant in the Hasan-si L Building M of the Sinsan-si, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, was aware of the fact that the cost of 10,00,000 from the 130,000 or KRW 1,000 per 2,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)