beta
Text
[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months
[Defendant M, N, andO] Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. No one shall solicit, arrange, mediate, or place an advertisement on the provision of telecommunications services necessary for the use of a mobile communications terminal device, on condition that the Defendants provide or lend funds;
Nevertheless, the defendants provided money to relatives in the neighborhood, let them open smartphones, and came to gather living expenses, etc. after being transferred, and sold to the purchaser of the middle and high smartphones.
The Defendants would provide Q with KRW 50,00 per week by opening smartphones in the vicinity of the smartphone agency in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on December 7, 2016, according to the foregoing mothers as above.
Recommendation made by Q to open one of the above smartphone 7 smartphones at the above smartphone agency, as well as from that to January 31, 2017, the attached Form is between Q to that point.
1. A total of 52 times, as indicated in the crime sight list, the smartphone was opened in a total of 52 occasions.
As a result, the Defendants solicited each contract for the provision of telecommunications services necessary for the use of the mobile communications terminal device on condition that the Defendants provided funds.
2. On December 7, 2016, the Defendant recommended the Victim Q Q through M, etc., in the vicinity of the smartphone agency in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant committed the crime of Defendant A, and there is insufficient smartphones to be used by the delivery center of the contact delivery unit, as described in paragraph 1.
The smartphone shall be paid 50,00 won per week on the opening of the smartphone, and the telecommunication fee and the installment of the device shall be paid.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, the defendant only tried to sell smartphones to the purchaser of smartphones and to prepare living expenses, etc., and pay the telecommunications charges and installments.