A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:10 on September 27, 2015, the Defendant heard the explanation that the Defendant would not call the Defendant’s phone number from the police officer affiliated with the Masan Police Station of the Masan-dong Police Station, who was called upon the Defendant’s 112 report to locate a person, and sent the Defendant, and assault the Defendant, “E” to “I see this dog, young gue, young gue, the police officer, “I am me,” and “I am me, I am hick, I am hume, and am hume, I am hume, I am hume, and am hume, I am hume, I am this.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers with respect to 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol of E prepared by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes prepared by the F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months] (the decision of the sentenced sentence] [the person subject to a special sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence 2 years (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no past record of the suspended sentence or higher, the two years of suspended sentence, and the crime that interferes with the execution of official duties will not be re-offending again.

(3) such consideration as the