A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:10 on January 26, 2016, the Defendant voluntarily filed 112 reports on the following grounds: (a) the proprietor had been drunkly withdrawn from the Defendant; and (b) the proprietor also reported 112 that the Defendant had concerns over avoiding disturbance; (c) while the Defendant was going to move the Defendant out of the business site, the Defendant was placed on several floors of his mobile phone without any particular reason, and (d) the F was pushed the Defendant’s chest with the right-hand knicks of F with the right-hand knicks of the horse, the left-hand knicks of F with the upper knicks of F.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on respective statements made to F and G prepared by the police;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months] (the decision of the sentenced sentence] [the person subject to a special sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence 2 years (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no past record of the suspended sentence or higher, the two years of suspended sentence, and the crime that interferes with the execution of official duties will not be re-offending again.

(3) such consideration as the