A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2015, at around 17:50, the Defendant received a demand for returning home from E in the situation where the Mapo-gu Police Station D police box sent to the site after receiving a report on November 12, 2015 on the ground that it was difficult for the Defendant to have avoided drinking, such as spiting the door of a vehicle owned by another person parked on the road due to drinking drinking, spiting it on the street, and spiting it on the street, etc.

The Defendant, “Isle, Isle, Isle several ages;

In the expression of “I ambling.”, the part of E’s right-hand beam was assaulted once to walk, thereby obstructing police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the statement protocol for E prepared by the police;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months] (the decision of the sentenced sentence] [the person subject to a special sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence 2 years (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no past record of the suspended sentence or higher, the two years of suspended sentence, and the crime that interferes with the execution of official duties will not be re-offending again.

(3) such consideration as the