A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2016, the Defendant, around 22:55, was under influence of alcohol in front of the studio parking lot B in Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and discovered the same and reported it to 112.

Defendant 1, who was sent to the scene pursuant to the above 112 report, was able to take home from the police officer D and assistant E belonging to the police officer assigned to the Masan East Police Station C police station in accordance with the above 112, and the Defendant 1, who was able to get home from the police officer D and the assistant E, shall read “this flag, flag,

“In doing so, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report 112 by assaulting D, such as walking the D’s bridge to display D’s drinking bridge, continuing to see D’s ebbbbage, and flapsing D’ face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each statute prepared by D or E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to January 4] (the decision of the sentenced sentence] [the person subject to a special sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence 2 years (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no same record as or higher than the suspended sentence, and the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties will not be re-offending again.

(3) such consideration as the