A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:05 on January 31, 2013, the Defendant, who was a victim E and the taxi driver of DNFIS on the front of the C apartment in Silung-si, Silung-si, was damaged to the extent that the cost of repair equivalent to KRW 286,766 of the market price of the taxi owned by the victim, who was a victim E and the taxi driver of the above taxi, was lowered from the above taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A vehicle estimate;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of each case

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of causing property damage and the choice of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have any consent from the victim's vehicle in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel regarding the claim of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

살피건대, 위에서 거시한 증거들을 종합하여 보면, 피해자는 이 사건 법정 및 수사기관에서 피고인이 피해자의 차량을 발로 찼다고 진술한 점, 피해자의 차량에는 찌그러진 부분이 있고, 그 부분에 검은 색 얼룩이 있는데, 피고인의 신발 앞 쪽에도 검은 색 얼룩이 있는 점 등의 사정이 보이는바, 이러한 사정을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 판시 범죄사실과 같이 피해자의 차량을 발로 찼다고 인정함이 상당하다고 할 것이다.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.