1. The Defendant: (a) 25,237,420 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 25,673,605 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 5,030,100 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) 9,032.

1. Basic facts

(a) Project name: H Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant project”);

2) Project implementer: Defendant 3 public notice: I public notice of Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City on July 6, 2012

B. The date of adjudication of expropriation by the Gwangju Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee (1) : The object of expropriation by December 12, 2013: Each land indicated in the column for each “land to be expropriated” listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”): Compensation for losses by taking an arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal companies: The amount of compensation for each of the instant lands shall be calculated as indicated in the separate sheet for each “adjudication on Expropriation” as stated in the separate sheet for each “Adjudication on Expropriation” (hereinafter the appraisal results by the said appraiser).

4) Commencement date of expropriation: January 26, 2014

(1) Date of the ruling by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on an objection: The content of the ruling by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on August 21, 2014: the arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal firms, and the purport of the entire pleadings, each of the entries in the column for “compensation for a complaint” in the separate sheet in the separate sheet in the separate sheet in the separate sheet as follows (if the compensation for each of the instant lands was increased only by the plaintiff A and G, the remaining plaintiffs' objection should be dismissed; hereinafter the above appraiser's appraisal result is referred to as the "appraisal for a complaint") / without any dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4, Eul evidence 1 (including each number), and Eul evidence 1 (including each number).

2. Inasmuch as the Plaintiffs’ compensation for each land of this case was set at a lower level without due consideration of the example of compensation, revision of other factors, etc., the amount of compensation for the Plaintiffs should be increased as much as the difference between the amount of compensation appropriately calculated by the appraisal conducted by this court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) and the amount of compensation determined by the expropriation ruling or its ruling.

3. In a lawsuit concerning an increase or decrease of compensation for expropriation, each appraisal that forms the basis for the expropriation and its ruling and appraisal by a court appraiser shall be all conducted.