Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) Project name: E road construction work (j) project implementer: Defendant 3’s public notice: F in the public notice given by the Dosan Regional Land Management Office on March 27, 2004; G in the same public notice on August 26, 201; and H in the same public notice on November 8, 201;
B. On July 18, 2013, the date of adjudication of expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee: The date of commencement of expropriation, taking an arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal firms, 12,234,120 won for the item of this case, 4) : The average of the values appraised by two appraisal firms: 12,234,120 won for the item of this case.
(1) The date of adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on an objection: The illegality of the adjudication on the instant trees increased to KRW 21,100,000 by taking an arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal companies: The relevant appraisal that forms the basis for calculating the transfer cost, and the relevant appraisal that forms the basis for calculating the acquisition price are briefly stated only in the transfer cost, and the appraisal and adjudication on the instant trees are unlawful by evaluating the amount of compensation without disclosing the types, quantities, and specifications of the instant trees.
D. As a result of each entrustment of appraisal on the trees of this case, appraiser C, B, and D of the first instance trial appraised the compensation for losses of the trees of this case as follows:
The appraiser C’s “the first court appraiser”; “the second court appraiser”; and “the third court appraiser”; and “the second court appraiser”; the result of the first court appraiser’s appraisal is “the first court appraiser”; and the second court appraiser’s appraisal.”
A. The third court appraisal of KRW 33,025,460 as the acquisition value of the second court appraiser as the acquisition value of the third court appraiser of KRW 34,164,00 as the first court appraiser for the compensation of losses for the appraiser, and the third court appraiser of KRW 95,740,000 as the acquisition value of the third court appraiser of KRW 33,025,460 as the acquisition value was determined per share based on the results of search and investigation