logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.10.29 2014구합10509
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,064,00 and KRW 5% per annum from September 11, 2013 to October 29, 2015 and the next day.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Project approval and the name of public announcement of the project: E road construction work (the second public announcement by the Defendant: F in the public announcement of the Korea National Land Management Agency on March 27, 2004, G in the public announcement of the Korea Regional Land Management Agency on August 26, 201, and H in the public announcement of the Korea Land Management Agency of the Korea Land and Transport on November 8, 2011: The object of expropriation by the Korea Land Expropriation Commission on July 18, 2013: Bosung-gun I and J (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant land”) consisting of a white iron and a asset red, as deemed to be followed by the settlement of the real estate owned by the Plaintiff on the ground of Bosung-gun and J ( collectively referred to as the “instant land”).

(hereinafter "Compensation for losses": The date of expropriation of 12,234,120 won for losses for the trees of this case by taking an arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal firms: The date of adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on September 10, 2013: on March 20, 2014, the amount of compensation for losses for the trees of this case increased to 21,100,000 won by taking an arithmetic mean of the values appraised by two appraisal firms: the acquisition value of the first court appraiser C, B, and D as the second court appraiser for the compensation for losses of this case as a result of each appraisal of 34,164,00 won as the acquisition value of the second court appraiser for the damages of this case by 33,025,460 won, C, and D as the acquisition value of the third court appraiser for the damages of this case by 95,740,000 won, as the acquisition value of the third court appraiser for the damages of this case as follows:

(2) The court’s appraisal results are as follows. (3) The court’s appraisal results are as follows. The court’s appraisal results are as follows. The court’s appraisal results are as follows. The court’s appraisal results are as follows. The court’s appraisal results are as follows: “the third court’s appraisal”; “the third court’s appraisal results”; “the third court’s appraisal results”; and “the third court’s appraisal results”; and the third court’s appraisal results.” The court’s appraisal results are as follows: (4) there is no dispute; (5) evidence Nos. 1 through 4; (5) evidence Nos. 1 through 2; and (4) each statement of evidence Nos. 1 and 1 and 2; (8) the Plaintiff’s appraisal results; (4) the purport of the entire pleadings; and (5) the Plaintiff’s assertion

arrow