All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment (six months of imprisonment) of the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable, and that the gist of the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor is unreasonable because the punishment of the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant had been punished for the suspension of execution for the same kind of crime, he again committed the crime in this case; the defendant's delivery company with the country of origin falsely indicates the country of origin accurately for the health and safety of the students who grow up as school meal service enterprises; the defendant falsely marks the country of origin in school meal service enterprises despite being well aware that he wanted domestic fishery products; the defendant was inevitable to commit the crime in the structural and economic weak status of the school meal service system; however, even when he received domestic fishery products after being stated in the order, he falsely marks the country of origin as a domestic country because he demanded domestic fishery products; the defendant's statement with the investigative agency that the country of origin was falsely labeled due to the difference in the purchase price; and the defendant's statement in the police officer's statement that he declared that it was difficult to accept the defendant's false country of origin due to unavoidable circumstances; and the defendant's assertion that he had not changed its credibility from 1201 to 14.21.21.21.21.

However, the defendant himself recognizes the crime of this case and made a mistake.