logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.04.11 2012고정3282
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:20 on June 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 00:20, in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Chop house, and from the victim D (the age of 56) prior to Han-gu, the Defendant got off the tables without any reason of alcohol; (b) the Defendant got off the tables at the right angle of the Defendant and the victim; (c) the victim’s knife at once; (d) the victim’s knife was towed out of the place of business, and caused the victim to knife the head of the street so that the treatment period cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. A criminal report, a criminal investigation report, and a criminal investigation report (a counter investigation of the business owner at the main office);

1. Application of damaged photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the defendant and his defense counsel argued that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim D and was assaulted by the victim and E as stated in its reasoning. Thus, the above argument is rejected since the defendant can be acknowledged as having inflicted any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning, i.e., the victim D and witness E made a statement that the defendant injured the victim as stated in its reasoning, i.e., the victim D and witness E, the owner of the C Hop house, and the defendant testified that the defendant showed that he had observed the test bble within the above head office and her blick the blicket, and that the defendant had been faced with the victim's body at the time of being dispatched to the scene after receiving a report, taking into account the fact that the defendant had inflicted any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning.

arrow