Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On June 1, 2014, around 16:55, the Defendant, along with D, requested that the Defendant use a mobile phone to the victim E, who was on a back-to-face 116-1, in front of a bank apartment path located in Hanam-si, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, and 30-1,00,000,000 won from the victim, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and that the Defendant used a mobile phone from 4 times to June 7, 2014 to 329,00,000 won in total, from 44,000,000 won in each of the mobile phone prices from the victim and 3,290,000 won in each of the mobile phone prices from 3,000,000 won in early 20,000 won in each of the following ways.

As such, the Defendant, together with D, stolen the victims’ property.

2. Defendant B

A. On June 2014, the Defendant purchased stolen goods at KRW 250,000,000 of S4 mobile phone market price of KRW 990,00 and KRW 900,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

B. On June 4, 2014, the Defendant purchased 50,000 won of the market value of the gallon 2 mobile phone owned by the victim G from A, as set forth in paragraph (1), from each other at the front of the Seoul hotel, every car located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to acquire stolen goods at the price of KRW 120,000,000, even though he was aware that it was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants and D’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of E and H;

1. Each statement of F, G, and I;

1. Each report on the occurrence of a crime, report on internal investigation, investigation report (to hear the statements of a victim G excursion ship);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damage scenes;

1. Article 33 of the Criminal Act and Article 337 of the Criminal Act: Defendant A who has the option to commit the crime;