logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.08 2013고단4822
범인도피교사
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 23:00 on January 9, 2013, Defendant A, the two items of “C”, the violent organization of Defendant A, had a eyebrow, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of treatment by considering the Defendant’s face value, etc. on the ground that the Defendant does not have personnel management.

Nevertheless, around 18:00 on January 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated that “B, in front of the H building operated by D located in Incheon Strengthening-gun G, said H employees, “I am at the police station, I am at the time I am. I am. I am. I am.” and (b) instigated B to make a false statement as described in the foregoing paragraph (2), thereby allowing B to escape.

2. Defendant B, at around 10:20 on January 30, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she, while knowing that he/she committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment heavier than a fine, he/she had the police officer I and the fact that he/she committed a crime corresponding to a police officer I and the above D, while having been aware of the fact that he/she committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment heavier than a fine, and had the said D escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the prosecution;

1. Statement to A by the prosecution;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of the police statement law to J

1. Relevant Article 151 (1) and 31 (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Criminal Act - Defendant A: Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the community service order: (a) despite the fact that the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act was inflicted by Defendant A with injury in line with D, Defendant B instigated Defendant B to make a false statement in order to escape, Defendant B made a false statement after attending the investigative agency according to Defendant A’s teacher and the investigation agency; and (b) the Defendants interfered with the exercise of criminal justice function.

arrow