Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 12, 2013, Defendant A made a false statement to Defendant A, prior to the D cafeteria located in Busan Metropolitan City, that: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant made a telephone call to the pro-Japanese B to conceal the driving of alcohol; and (c) the Defendant made a false statement to Defendant B, who did not drink alcohol level; and (d) made it possible to make a false statement to Defendant B, who did not drink alcohol level.

Therefore, the Defendant sought to B around that time, and made a false statement to B as “I have driven at the time of the accident” to the assistant F who had investigated the above case, and had B prepare a self-statement and take a drinking test.

As a result, the defendant instigated the above B to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. On October 13, 2013, Defendant B stated that, even though he did not drive a G A-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Ped

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above A escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement of H;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the place of accident and vehicle photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Articles 151(1) and 31(1) (Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act; Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;