Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On August 18, 2015, Defendant A driven the EM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.160% in the section of about 10km from around 689 to around 16:2:13 to 23:16 on August 18, 2015, under the influence of alcohol level of around 0.160% in blood.

B. On August 18, 2015, Defendant A also driven the said SM5 vehicle on behalf of Defendant A at the house of Defendant A located in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu F, and on August 18, 2015, Defendant A also driven the said SM5 vehicle on behalf of Defendant A by telephone and text message to conceal the fact of resistance A.

B made a false statement by asking for the statement and asking for it.

B, around 10:48 on August 24, 2015, at the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin Police Station Traffic Survey Center's office, B driving the said SM5 car with a slope G belonging to the above police station.

On October 14, 2015, a false statement was made to the same effect at the same place.

As a result, Defendant A instigated Defendant A to escape from committing a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B, at the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Gwangjin Police Station’s Traffic Survey Center’s office around 10:48 on August 24, 2015, Defendant B, while being aware of the fact that Defendant B committed an offense as referred to in paragraph 1-A, Defendant B driven the said SM5 vehicle by Defendant B to an slope G belonging to the said police station, while Defendant B was aware of the fact that Defendant B committed an offense as referred to in paragraph 1-A.

On October 14, 2015, a person made a false statement and made a false statement to the same effect at the same place, so that A who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment has been allowed to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police against Defendant B;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking and the statement in the circumstances of the driver;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to photograph text messages stored in B mobile phones;

1. Criminal facts;