logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.06.28 2013노36
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant of mistake of facts only made a verbal statement to the victims A and C, and did not commit an injury to the victim in collusion with A and C.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The victim and theO made a statement to the effect that they appeared as a witness in the court of original instance, that the defendant did not commit any harm by assaulting the victim with A and C, and that they made a statement to the effect that they assault A, etc. to assault the victim.

However, the court of the court below asserts that the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly investigated and adopted by the court of the original instance: ① the victim was at the investigative agency, the victim was at the time of the victim's back head behind the victim's body (the 45 pages, 172 pages of the evidence records), the defendant was released from the victim's head to be be beerer, and the defendant stated that the victim was also the victim at the time of the victim's knife (the 89 pages and 90 pages of the evidence records), ② the defendant did not have conspired with A and C, and the defendant was only told at the time of the crime. However, the victim stated that the victim was unable to move from the victim's body without a magazine, and that the victim was able to escape from the police station (the 163 pages of the evidence records), and that the police police officer did not escape from the victim's body, and that the defendant did not escape from the police station during the crime.

arrow