The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and inappropriate sentencing)

A. The Defendant, at the time of the instant case, misunderstanding of facts, only told C and the victim that he was wraped, and prevented C from leaving the body of the victim by putting the victim behind it, and there is no fact that C aided and abetted C to inflict an injury on the victim.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 300,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (a) the victim: (i) Da, the owner of the Esferer, was satisfying with her own trial cost; and (ii) the defendant who was following C in the process, stated that “I am satch, satched her head, satched her body, and C was satched with satched at that time; (ii) it is difficult to find an objective reason or circumstance that the victim made a false statement to satisfy the defendant; (iii) G, the witness at a relatively objective position, satisfyed, “I am satched the victim’s face at the time of the instant case, and satisfyd with the victim’s face when I satisfyd with the victim’s oral testimony that I satisfyd with the victim’s face.”