A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

After forging an application for joining a mobile phone together with C, D, and E, the Defendant planned to take advantage of the forged application for joining a mobile phone and a copy of the forged resident registration certificate after taking advantage of the mobile phone from the telecommunications company.

C In accordance with the above plan, according to the above plan, the victim SK Telecom Corporation's cell phone sales store located in F on January 24, 2013.

E arbitrarily prepares a new contract for H’s mobile phone service in the name of H, and the E has been kept in custody through e-mail by securing an une-mail with the une-mail;

H submitted a copy of the forged resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along with the forged mobile phone service new contract.

The Defendant, in collusion with C, E, and D, forged a new contract for mobile phone service in the above H’s name, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it, and received a copy of the resident registration certificate of the above H under the name of the head of Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City head of the Gu, which is an official document, from the victim’s company that believed that the above H applied for a new mobile phone service by using a copy of the resident registration certificate of the above H under the name of the head of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City head of the Gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City head of the Gu, and acquired it by delivery from the victim company of the mobile phone E250S in an amount equivalent to the market price, and forged seven copies of the mobile phone service contract from January 24, 2013 to January 29, 2013 as indicated in the attached list of crimes, each of them exercised three copies, and received it from the victim company and received seven copies of the mobile phone from the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against the defendant, E, D, or C (including the part concerning each substitute statement);

1. Each police statement made to I, J, and K;

1. Each complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting the crime;