A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant advertised “Csansan Ginseng” as if he had undergone a quality inspection through banner, public transportation bus advertising, Internet portal site, etc., and intended to sell the forged special forest product quality inspection certificate along with the mountain ginseng, as if he had received the quality inspection from the victims of the phone using the advertising report, and received the sale price from the head of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute.

1. On July 2012, the Defendant forged public document documents: (a) at the Defendant’s residence located in G, Masan-gun, Gansan-gun; (b) the producer entered “Esansan-gun” in the name of the president of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute; and (c) copied the document using a local sign, and then requested an advertising company with which the name cannot be known; and (d) changed the Esansan ginseng listed in the “producer” to “C” mountain ginseng and copied the certificate of passing the document using a reproduction machine.

For this purpose, the Defendant forged two copies of the quality inspection certificate of special forest products in the name of the president of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute, which is an official document.

2. Where any producer who violates the Forestry and Mountain Villages Development Promotion Act intends to distribute or sell cultivated ginseng which is a special forest product or any person who has imported special forest products intends to clear such ginseng, he/she shall undergo a quality inspection conducted by a specialized institution in advance.

However, the Defendant, around January 2013, without having undergone a quality inspection under the name of the producer “Csansan Ginseng”, advertised as if it was “Csan Fishery Ginseng” that passed the quality inspection and, even if it was ordered to do so from another person, it was in a state of no intent or ability to provide a normal quality inspection. A.

On January 31, 2013, the Defendant advertised as if it was a mountain ginseng that had undergone a quality inspection through F, a dynamic F, and then ordered the advertisement to be reported and ordered, and KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000 from G.