1. Defendant I, J,K, L, P, Q, R, S, T, U,V, W, X, and Y are the annexed list 2 of the real estate listed in the annexed list 1 to the Plaintiffs.

1. Claim against Defendant I, J, K, L, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, and Y

(a)the description of the reasons for the claim is as shown in Appendix 3;

B. Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the applicable provisions of the Acts (the judgment by the host of a confession) only submitted a letter of delegation that Defendant I, J, K, L, L, P, Q, R, and U delegate delegate the authority to the instant lawsuit to Defendant H on December 27, 2017. There was no submission of a document to the effect that Defendant G, H, and N submitted a written reply on November 29, 2017 before the submission of each of the said respective delegations, and it cannot be deemed that Defendant G, H, and N submitted a written reply on November 29, 2017, while submitting the written reply to Defendant I, J, K, L, P, Q, Q, R, and U.

b. Claim against Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, M, N, andO

A. On February 15, 1928, the Z of the basic fact-finding network completed the registration of preservation of ownership on the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and died on November 20, 1984.

On the other hand, over the other hand, AA succeeded to the network Australia, and AB, AC, AD, AE, and AF are children of AA, and the plaintiffs are children of the above AE.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

B. The plaintiffs asserted that, around July 1, 2015, AA occupied the real estate of this case as the intention of ownership by inheritance from the Z in 1984, and the plaintiffs succeeded to the possession by gifting 1/2 shares of each of the real estate of this case from AA on January 1, 2015, the plaintiffs succeeded to the possession of each of the real estate of this case as of July 1, 2015, and the period of prescription for the possession of each of the real estate of this case has expired by succession to the possession of AA for 20 years. Thus, the defendants are obligated to implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of each ownership on July 1, 2015.

The plaintiffs choose on January 1, 1995 as the starting point for acquisition by prescription in the cause of the complaint.