Text
1. The part of the first instance judgment against the Defendants shall be revoked.
2. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all satisfied.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 10, 1963, the deceased on January 10, 1963, the network S succeeded to the network T, children, J, R, the network A, and the network U.S., and on April 18, 1950, K, a child of the network S, succeeded to the network T with its children, and on October 8, 1971, K, a child, succeeded to the network T with its children, by the deceased on April 18, 1950. The deceased on October 8, 1971, the network T succeeded to the network T with its children, WW, the wife of the V, the child, and K, the child, the deceased on April 18, 1950.
B. Meanwhile, on March 4, 1969, the network W married with the network X (Death on July 8, 200), and on October 23, 201, the networkW inherited the networkW, which is a child, K, Q and R, as its child, upon death on October 23, 201.
C. On May 5, 1981, the deceased on May 5, 1981, the deceased deceased and succeeded to the lost U by Defendant M, N,O, and P as the wife.
The deceased on July 24, 2016, and the deceased on July 24, 2016, Plaintiff C, D, E, F, G, H, and I taken over the instant lawsuit.
E. Each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estates”) is owned by the network S with the land under circumstances or purchased by the network S.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, and 6 evidence (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiffs’ assertion SP donated each of the instant real estate to the deceased on February 10, 2016, and the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs, the deceased’s heir, according to their respective inheritance shares.
3. Determination
A. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 7, and 8 (if there are serial numbers, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the entire purport of the arguments and arguments, the deceased Gap continued to manage each of the instant real estate after the deceased S and paid taxes. Meanwhile, the deceased Gap (2) and the network U (3) as a son (First, V was dead at the time of Jeju 43 Incident, Fourth, AA was dead at the time of Jeju 43 Incident, fourth, 3,067 square meters (united 10,139 square meters) and AB 885 square meters (united 2,926 square meters) prior to Jeju Jeju-do Z (united 2,926 square meters) respectively.