(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.12.28 2011고단6418

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.12.28 2011고단6418

모욕

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On October 11, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on October 23:30, 201, while drinking alcoholic beverages together with “D” restaurant C, the Defendant: (b) sent to the instant restaurant proprietor and the victim F (55 years old), a police officer upon receipt of a report of the drinking value due to the drinking value; (c) the Defendant “I am feass, rings, rings, sweets, sweets, and do not have any sweaks; (d) the lifelong police officer wears the rank of the head of Sknife, sweets, and is very poor; (d) the opening of the restaurant proprietor and other sweets, etc., who were sent to the police officer.” (d) The Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by continuously taking a heavy bath in front of the restaurant proprietor and other sweets.

2. At around 23:59 on the same day, the Defendant was found to the G Security Center located in Daegu Suwon-gu, and 23:59 on the same day, and 4 persons such as the Defendant’s wife and the Bron-H, etc. who are dealing with other reported cases, insulting F, etc., the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim F by referring to the Defendant’s wife and four police officers: (a) how much the police officer was involved in a civil case; (b) the police officer who received uniforms drinked and frighted. At the same time, the police officer in our country should not be aware.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Determination of each of the defendants and defense counsel's arguments against the witness F, I, and J

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there is no room for the victim to take a bath at a restaurant as stated in the facts charged, and at the G Public Security Center, respectively.

However, as a result of the examination of the evidence of this Court, the injured police F, the police I, the cafeteria, who was called as a cafeteria together with the defendant, reported the disturbance to the police, and the F and I reported the disturbance to the police, and the defendant was sent to the cafeteria by the F and I, and the F and I stated that the defendant expressed that the defendant was expressed to F in the G Public Security Center.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2012.12.26 2012고정4727

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.11.18 2015고단1604

-대구지방법원 2020.05.28 2020고정3

-대구지방법원 2013.04.17 2012고정4381

-서울남부지방법원 2017.04.27 2017고단440