logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.11.02 2016누11887
부정당업자 제재 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is that the part concerning "the Act on Contracts to Which the State Is a Party" No. 45 of the first instance judgment No. 1 is "the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" (amended by Act No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply). The fourth part of "Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" No. 12 is "the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27475, Sept. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply), the fifth part of "Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" No. 1, 1, 2, 1000, 1, 2000, 1, 3000, 1, 400, 1, 2017).

arrow