logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.11.02 2016누11924
부정당업자제재처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court shall explain this case in this case is "202" of the second 3 and fourth 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

9.6. According to Article 1 of the Act on Contracts to Which the State Is a Party (amended by Act No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply), the fourth and fourth parts of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party (amended by Presidential Decree No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply) are as follows: (a) the portion of the “Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party” (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27475, Sept. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply); (b) the portion of the “Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party”; (c) the portion of the “Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party” (amended by Presidential Decree No. 17475, Sep. 1, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply) is as follows; and (d) the part of the Plaintiff’s proposal No. 1 and 7.7.

arrow