The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of the judgment of the court below (two years of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, five million won of fine, probation, social service, 80 hours of fine) is too unreasonable.

Since the act of arranging sexual traffic is a crime that has a great impact on the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, there is a need to strictly punish the parties who operate the sexual traffic business establishment in order to prevent such act. Even around June 11, 2012, the defendant had a record of punishment by forcing female employees to engage in obscene acts at the instant business establishment. Nevertheless, the defendant, even though one month has not passed after the police control, once again operated the instant business establishment (Evidence Record 74 pages), taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the method of the instant crime, period of the crime, profits, circumstances after the crime, the age and character of the defendant, etc., the punishment of the court below is unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.