logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.09 2015고단1390
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around February 27, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “When a cell phone currently in use is replaced by a new product, KRW 958,272 shall be provided each month, KRW 39,928 shall be provided each month for 24 months by phone call from D office located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu.”

However, the defendant, at the time, has forged the application for joining by many unspecified persons, disposed of the application through the mobile phone, induced a large number of subscribers, etc., and operated sales stores in an reckless and abnormal manner, such as attracting a large number of subscribers, and even if the victim opens a new mobile phone, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the above money with the payment for the victim.

The defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim bear the obligation to pay the mobile phone amounting to KRW 958,272, and had the victim acquire the same amount of installment claim from the mobile phone agent F.

"2015 Highest 1967"

1. An nominal G-related crime;

A. Around August 16, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document, or the uttering of a private document, which is a private document related to rights and duties without authority, for the purpose of exercising his/her signature by means of arbitrarily recording the personal information in the subscriber column of the LGU mobile phone subscription application form at the H office of Section 1 (a) without the consent of G, and used the private document by submitting a forged application form for a mobile phone entry in the name of the said G, which is a private document related to rights and duties, by means of using the signature of the said G, and transmitting the forged document to the employees under the name of the “I” who are the opening agency of the mobile phone who

B. The Defendant, at the above date and place, issued a forged G U U U’s application for joining the victim’s name in the same manner as in the foregoing paragraph, and opened a “portable phone.”

arrow