A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who was working from April 2012 to June 19, 2014 for LG U mobile phone agencies located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “D”).

The Defendant, who had opened a normally mobile phone in D, has forged an application for mobile phone subscription using his name, resident registration number, telephone number, address, etc., and tried to open the mobile phone using it and sell the mobile phone with a heavy seal to acquire the sales proceeds, etc.

Around December 30, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document, and the use of a falsified document, at the office of the foregoing “D,” without the consent of E, submitted the document as if he/she was genuine to employees under the name of LG Plus Co., Ltd., a document to which he/she belongs, by entering “E”, “F”, and “F” in the resident registration number column, without the consent of E, as “E”, and signing it on his/her name and side, and forging one copy of the application for membership under the name of E in relation to rights and obligations.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged an application form for subscription in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority, and used it. From that time, the Defendant forged 22 copies of the application form for mobile phone subscription through 22 times from that time to June 19, 2014, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

B. The Defendant’s fraud was above.

At the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), the victim LG Plus Co., Ltd. submitted an application for subscription to E in the above manner to the staff in charge of the victim’s LG Plus, and made a false statement to the effect that “when opening a mobile phone, he/she will faithfully pay the mobile phone value

However, the defendant tried to open a mobile phone without the consent of the member E and sell it to the seller of the above mobile phone.