logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2020.06.10 2019고단1916
특수재물손괴등
Text

Defendant

A, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, Defendant D and B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 1916"

1. The crime committed on September 28, 2017;

A. At around 15:50 on September 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while driving a motor vehicle of E-burged, Defendant B, while driving the motor vehicle of E-burged in addition to C, was on board the passenger F, G, and H; and (b) while intentionally coloring the motor vehicle accident insurance subject, Defendant B proceeded in the two-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the J Contracting State located in Busan Suwon-gu I from K to the parallel of South Korea at an insular speed; and (c) made a correction of any clerical error in the indictment from the same direction to the two-lane.

Finding M SP car of victim L who has changed the course was found.

At this time, the Defendant did not avoid an accident for the purpose of deceiving insurance money by pretending the normal traffic accident even though he could sufficiently avoid the traffic accident, and did not avoid the accident, and shocked the front door of the above victim L/C driving on the left side of the front driver of the Defendant vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the victim L's MT car's MT car's MT car's 750,000 won per repair cost using a dangerous vehicle.

B. Defendants B and C, and C, of violation of the Special Act on Insurance Fraud Prevention, conspireded to offer money to use for entertainment expenses on September 2017, 2017, to commit an insurance fraud. Defendant B and C conspired to commit an insurance fraud. The F, G, and H, which came to know through the P, G, and H, stated that “the boomed and satisfed with a satch,” was on board the vehicle, and caused a traffic accident to have been caused intentionally to acquire the insurance money.

Accordingly, as described in paragraph (1) above, the Defendants and the above F, G, and H received the insurance as if they were damaged by normal traffic accidents and damaged vehicles due to the injury of the victim N, an insurance company of M SP vehicle L, as described in paragraph (1) above.

Ultimately, the Defendants, F, G, and H are insurance frauds against the victim N in collusion.

arrow