logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.10.22 2020고단1748
보험사기방지특별법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes on November 27, 2017;

A. Around 15:50 on November 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a B Costex vehicle; (b) intentionally 7 passengers, such as C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and I, are on board; (c) three-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the J building in Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant carried out the three-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the building in front of the Busan Metropolitan City at an insular speed, while driving the three-lanes of the three-lanes in front of the building, and was found to be NN owned by the victim M, Co., Ltd. in the same direction.

At this time, the defendant did not avoid the accident with the intention of acquiring insurance money by pretending the normal traffic accident even though he could sufficiently avoid the traffic accident, and was faced with the part after the driver's seat of the damaged vehicle on the right side of the victim vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the car to be 147,700 won in repairing cost by using a dangerous vehicle, which is a dangerous object.

B. On November 201, 2017, the Defendant in violation of the Special Act on Insurance Fraud Prevention and C, and C, and D conspired to commit an insurance fraud by intentionally causing a traffic accident to raise money to be used for living expenses and entertainment expenses. The Defendant and C, and D, through Facebook, intended to use money to E, F, G, H, and I and intended to buy the insurance money by intentionally causing a traffic accident after boarding a vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant and C, D, E, F, G, H, and I received insurance as if they were injured and damaged due to a normal traffic accident, as described in the above 1-A, after the Defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident, as well as the victim P, an insurance company of N vehicle, and employees in the victim P, an insurance company of the Defendant, who are the insurance company of N vehicle, received the insurance as if they were damaged due to a traffic accident.

Ultimately, the Defendant, in collusion with C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, committed an insurance fraud against the victim P and the victim P.

arrow