logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.08.13 2019고단353
보험사기방지특별법위반
Text

1. As to Defendant A, B, and D

A. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for four months, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On December 21, 2018, upon being sentenced to one year and ten months to be punished by fraud, etc. in the original state branch of the Chuncheon District Court on December 21, 2018, the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2018. Defendant D was sentenced to six months by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of aiding and abetting an offender, etc. in the same court on April 5, 2018.

7. 19. The judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendants and H conspired to receive agreed money from an insurance company by pretending that a traffic accident occurred by negligence after causing an intentional traffic accident in the manner of receiving the vehicle that changes the vehicle vehicle, as they were aware of the fact that both of the Defendants and H knew in the ordinary world, or between the ship and the afterma.

1. On July 26, 2017, Defendant A, D, F, and H’s joint criminal conduct: (a) around 18:52 on July 26, 2017, Defendant A, D, F, and H were driven by Defendant A on a I-to-pp vehicle operated by Defendant A; and (b) on the front side of the K-to-p vehicle located in theJ at the original city, the road located in the jurisdiction of the Republic of Korea at the original city of the Republic of Korea was driven along one lane from the long-distance distance; (c) Defendant A, D, F, and H discovered the N-to-p-p vehicle of M changed from the last two lanes to the one-lane of the vehicle; and (d) Defendant A was bound by the front side of the vehicle’s right side.

Although the above facts of the traffic accident were intentionally caused according to the plan, the Defendants and H received insurance as if the traffic accident occurred by negligence, and it was paid from the victim O Co., Ltd. KRW 2,684,580 under the pretext of treatment, agreement amount, automobile repair expenses, etc. Defendant A received KRW 1,965,470 under the pretext of treatment, agreement amount, Defendant D were paid KRW 1,597,30 under the pretext of treatment, agreement amount, and KRW 1,64,720 under the pretext of agreement.

Accordingly, the above Defendants, in collusion with H, acquired a total of KRW 7,892,070 from the said victim.

2. On August 12, 2017, Defendant A, B, C, and D’s co-principal around August 12, 2017: (a) the Defendants are on board the IAW-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

arrow