A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 171] On January 19, 2017, the Defendant reported on the street “D in front of Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, 112 of the Military Police Station at three times under the influence of alcohol, and reported on the “as soon as possible mobilization”.

Accordingly, the police officer of the police station E District shall dispatch the police officer F to the scene, ask the defendant about the details of the report, and deal with the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

Defect "I amba, I amba amba

"I expressed my great desire to do so, as you can see the left hand, and assault F on one occasion the part of F in drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing duties.

[2017 Highest 792] On May 2, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., the victim H (45 tax) who was in Ansan-gu G during the period of Ansan-si on May 2, 2017, with alcohol having a shoulderer bottle while drinking, demanding the exchange of alcohol with a new beer, but the victim requested the exchange with a beer. However, the victim was not exchanged. However, the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., with the above shoulder beer disease, which is a dangerous object, and intending to injure the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 171]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. 112 Report processing table ( CHAPTER Three), 112 (Seoul High Court Order 792);

1. A H statement;

1. One CD [the defendant was trying to exchange with a beer's disease at the time, and there was no reason to do so. However, at the time, the victim submitted to the investigative agency a written statement that the defendant attempted to have a beer's disease, and the customer went out of the beer's disease. On the site CCTV at the time, the defendant's act did not appear on the screen, but on the screen, it is recorded that the nearest woman of the defendant went out of the beer's own body, which is the above H's statement that the defendant tried to go out of the beer's disease.