Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 24, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on April 24, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 2, 2018.
On May 2, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a special intimidation case against Defendant C at Daejeon District Court No. 403, Daejeon District Court No. 405, a 78-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court No. 403, May 2, 2017.
사실은 피고인은 2016. 11. 10. 23:00 경 대전 중구 D에 있는 E 노래방에서 위 C에게 깨진 맥주병으로 찌를 듯이 위협을 당한 사실이 있어 112에 신고를 하였고, 2017. 5. 22. 위 법정에서 증인으로 출석하여 증언할 당시에는 위 C가 맥주병을 깨뜨려 위협을 느낀 사실만 기억할 뿐 위 C가 피고인에게 깨진 맥주병을 들이댔는지 기억이 나지 않았다.
Nevertheless, the Defendant had been threatened with the Defendant by the Prosecutor’s “Iskicker in Esing room located in Daejeon on November 10, 2016, 23:00, Daejeon, by the Prosecutor.”
Secondly, there is a fact that the Defendant’s testimony “Is no fact of intimidation,” and ② the prosecutor’s “Is the fact that there was a threat to a witness with a shouldered beer’s disease after shouldering the beer’s disease).”
The Defendant’s question, “I do not do so.”
3. The prosecutor’s “Isker’s disease” (the Defendant’s wicker’s disease)
The Defendant’s question, “I do not do so.”
4. The prosecutor testified that the Defendant had a threat to the beer's disease by going directly to the beer's seat.
Considering the facts written in writing, the Defendant appears to have threatened the witness with beer disease, and the Defendant was asked to question whether there is no such fact or not, and the Defendant did not attack or threaten the beer disease.
It is the same that the proposal has been made in an erroneous expression.
5. The prosecutor’s “satisf.”