A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:50 on March 31, 2017, at the main point of “D’s operation” of the Victim C in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; and (b) even if the Defendant orders alcohol and alcohol, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the injured party; (c) ordered alcohol and alcohol as if he would pay the price to the injured party; and (d) the Defendant received food equivalent to KRW 450,00,00 from the injured party, namely, the amount of food to be paid to the injured party at KRW 450,00,00.

"2017 Highest 3472"

1. Crimes committed on April 6, 2017;

A. In spite of the fact that the Defendant did not have a valid means of payment, such as cash or credit card, and thus did not have an intent or ability to settle the price even if the Defendant received alcoholic beverages, the Defendant obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of the said amount by failing to pay the price, from the main point of “G” in the operation of the Victim F in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon at around April 6, 2017, by being provided with beer and bers equivalent to KRW 50,000 at the market price and by failing to pay the price.

B. The Defendant who interfered with the work was at the time and place indicated in the paragraph (a) and the issue of payment of the victim F and the alcohol value, and the Defendant was trying to report the Defendant to the police, and the victim’s “comfort with the mind.”

The death shall be discarded.

“In doing so, the victim’s main business by force interfered with the victim’s main business by neglecting the disturbance for about 20 minutes by putting the beer and brue of beer and brut disease, such as breaking the beer and bruting the beer and brut, thereby obstructing the victim’s escape.

(c)

In the date and time stated in paragraph (a), and at the place, the Defendant’s 112 report that the Defendant avoided the disturbance as above, and the victim guard I, who was affiliated with the Seo-gu Daejeon Police Station H District, tried to listen to the Defendant’s statement on the circumstances of the instant case from the Defendant. In the location where the said main place F, etc., the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to read, “If he was aware of the cryp, after having been known to the police officer’s head head head, and after having been known of the crypia, he would have to open the victim.”

2. On January 2017