A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act (d) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (d) driving a DNA car under the influence of alcohol 0.192% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the Do in front of the new apartment apartment located in the Soksan-dong, Busan, Busan, to the same apartment located in the same apartment zone; (b) around 300 meters away from the Do in front of the new apartment located in the Soksan-gu, Busan, Busan; (c)

2. On July 28, 2017, at around 09:17, the Defendant: (a) controlled the driving of drinking on the road prior to the Yansan apartment Yancheon-dong, Busan, Busan, the Defendant’s pro-friendly E name and resident registration number; (b) led the control police officer to enter personal information and the violation of the regulations on drinking driving in connection with a portable information terminal (PDA); and (c) signed the electronic signature as if he/she was requested to sign the driver’s signature.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of performing the duties of the Korean National Police Agency, forged the records of the crackdown on drinking driving, which is an electronic record, and caused the enforcement officer who is aware of such fact to send the records of the crackdown on driving of drinking, as if they were actually prepared, to reach the electronic records of the electronic records as if they were actually prepared.

3. The Defendant forged a private document and carried out the foregoing investigation document at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, and controlled by drinking driving at a place, and stated “E” in the driver’s signature column in which the control police officer requested signature from the state driver’s circumstantial statement report, and signed the document next to that name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the statement report on the circumstances of the driver in the name of E, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts, and around that time, submitted the false statement report to the control police officer who is unaware of the circumstances in the above Article.