1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A (including a claim changed in exchange at the trial) is as follows:

1. The grounds for the court's explanation on this part of the occurrence of liability for damages and the scope of liability for damages are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420

- The phrase "amount of compensation for damage" and the phrase "amount of after-the-counter treatment fee table" of the first instance judgment shall be replaced by the following corresponding table:

- The fifth page 5 of the first instance court's decision " February 6, 2028" is " March 6, 2028."

- Parts 5 through 17 of the first instance judgment are as follows.

(1) “(1) Mental health department: 12,573,308 won is deemed to have been disbursed on April 6, 2016, which is the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial for calculation convenience; (2) Mental health department: (i) Pharmacologic treatment, mental treatment, examination fees, etc.; (2) the requirement of KRW 16,086,948 in total for two years from the day following the date of closing of argument in the trial (670,289 won per month if calculated on the basis of one month); (3) the sum of the requested KRW 670,289 won per month from April 6, 2016 to April 6, 2016; and (3) the additional amount of KRW 16,470 from the first instance court judgment; and (4) the additional amount of KRW 970 from the first instance court judgment to the third court judgment; and (4) the additional amount of KRW 670,489 from the first instance judgment to the first instance judgment; and the additional amount of KRW 18136.48.6

- Parts 7 through 8 of the first instance judgment are as follows.

Ultimately, the difference between the plaintiff's assertion and the accident of this case is related.