beta
Text
1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The "this case" of Section 4, Section 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "the court of first instance", the "this court" of Sections 5, 3, and 4 as "the court of first instance", the 5, 6, 18, and 6, 14, and 19 shall be applied as follows. In addition to the replacement of the calculation table of damages according to the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance by reflecting the above contents, it shall be the same as the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to the replacement of the calculation table of damages in the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.
【The portion used in the aftermath 5th 5th 18th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 18th 12,525,480 won: 12,525th 480 won in the future treatment expense) treatment expense: 101,160,000 won (refer to the attached drug treatment expense calculation table) in order to prevent the aggravation of the state caused by damage to the two parts, the Plaintiff needs to perform drug treatment amounting to KRW 5,058,00 each year.
Meanwhile, the Plaintiff’s name was reduced to 89.6% of the average remaining life due to the instant accident, and the Plaintiff’s name ended on January 14, 2064.
When calculating the current amount of pharmacologic treatment expenses from the day after the date of closing of argument in the trial to the date of closing of life, it is KRW 101,160,000, as shown in the attached Form.
(B) In order to prevent excessive compensation, the Plaintiff needs to take corrective punishment on the reflect of the instant accident, and its cost is 4,686,800 won. It is deemed that the corrective punishment is implemented on the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial for convenience, and it is 3,651,954 won if it is calculated as of the date of the accident. [based on recognition] 12-1, 2-1, 2-2-2-2-2-2, Central University Hospital of the court of first instance and Hung National University Hospital of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as the “Man University”) and the purport of the entire oral argument.