1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of the first instance,

2. 2. 3. 1. ....... ........... ............... ..................................

At the bottom of the 8th judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “the instant project was impossible” shall be amended to read “the instant project was impossible.”

The "establishment interest" in the 11th sentence of the first instance court shall be amended to "authorization for establishment".

Note 12 of the Decision of the first instance court shall be amended to “201Da1389” in Note 4 to “2001Da1386.”

The "settlement money" of 13 pages 9, 10 and 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revised to "dues".

The resolution of dissolution shall be amended at the bottom of 13th of the judgment of the first instance court to "Dissolution".

The "charges" and the "charges" at the bottom of the 16th of the judgment of the first instance court, between the 16th of the 16th of the judgment, between the 17th of the 16th to the 17th of the 17th of the 17th.

A general meeting shall be amended at the bottom of the 16th judgment of the first instance court to "no general meeting shall be held."

On the 18th 3th 3th 18th s of the first instance judgment, the “instant service contract” shall be amended to the “instant design service contract”.

"B" partially amended on July 31, 2012 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Maintenance of Urban Areas, 24007, the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Maintenance of Urban Areas, 22 pages of the judgment of the first instance [the amended Act by Presidential Decree No. 24007, Jul. 31, 2012]

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as there is no ground, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and therefore, the defendants are justified.