1. The appeal by Plaintiff A and the appeal by the Defendant against the Plaintiffs are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be individually borne by the appellant.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for partial revision as follows.

The "74 high-priced329" of the 7th three pages of the first instance judgment shall be deemed to be "74 high-priced325", the "the first instance judgment" at the bottom of the same 7th instance judgment shall be deemed to be the "the first instance judgment", and the "the first instance judgment" at the bottom of the same 4th instance judgment shall be amended to be the "the second 27,174 won", respectively.

"At the fourth bottom of the first instance judgment (amended by Act No. 8730, Dec. 21, 2007)" shall be revised to "the examination of suspect of public prosecutor's office" at the fifth bottom of the first instance judgment, and "F" at the fourth bottom of the same part shall be revised to "the prosecutor's examination of suspect of public prosecutor's office", and "G" at the 6,7th bottom of the first instance judgment, "each entry" shall be revised to "each entry or video"; "Article 11" at the fourth bottom of the first instance judgment shall be revised to "Article 10"; "The amount of consolation money and consolation money at the 13th through 6th sentence of the first instance judgment (the plaintiff A shall be deemed to have been reduced to "the amount of consolation money at the 13th sentence of the above first instance judgment") shall not be further revised to "the amount of consolation money at the end of the first instance court's 13th sentence to 30 billion won or less, without the defendant's unlawful act."