1. According to the Plaintiff’s expansion of the purport of the claim in the trial, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial revisions, deletions, or additions as follows.

“Act No. 8852, Feb. 29, 2008” shall be amended to “Act No. 11377, Mar. 21, 2012, 2012.”

At the bottom of the three sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, "The non-level will be severe" shall be amended to "the non-level will be severe".

The letter of “B 1, 3, and 6” in the 8th sentence of the first instance court shall be amended by “(1, 3, and 6(including a number number; hereinafter the same shall apply)”, and “A 2, 4(a)” in the lower part of the 8th sentence shall be amended by “A 2, 4, and 6(s)”, respectively.

The second two pages of the judgment of the first instance court shall be amended to "high cargo (907 tons/day)" (917 tons/day).

The part of the Defendant’s “Defendant” was deleted at the bottom of the nine pages of the judgment of the first instance court, and at the bottom of the nine pages “4.3, 2008.4.3” was changed to “No. 2008.4.23,” “At the bottom of the nine pages”, “entry at the bottom of the nine pages” was changed to “the entry at the bottom of the nine pages”, and “the entry at the 10th three pages” was prescribed, and “the entry at the 10th three pages was made” was changed to “the entry at the bottom of the nine pages,” and the five pages at the bottom of the nine pages were changed to “the entire purport of each entry and pleading in the evidence No. 14, 15”.

At the bottom of the 10th judgment of the first instance court, “B evidence 12, 16, 17, and 18” was amended to “A evidence 2, B 12, 16, 17, 18, and B 14-8,” and “On the other hand, according to the evidence of the first 5th judgment” was added to “On the other hand, according to the above evidence.”

He/she shall revise the 13 pages 3 and 4 of the judgment of the first instance court to "any provision".

The following shall be added between 15 pages 10 and 11 of the judgment of the first instance:

【 Therefore, the Defendant’s total amount equivalent to the unpaid wage from July 18, 2009 to December 17, 2013 to the Plaintiff is KRW 347,314,936 (i.e., KRW 6,53,112 per month x 53 months and the Plaintiff’s request.