logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.10.20 2015고단2761
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of the BM5 car.

At around 05:50 on July 18, 2015, the Defendant defined one lane among the two-lane roads in front of the entrance crosswalk No. 3, 479, Dobong-ro, Dobong-gu, Seoul, and proceeded at an insular speed from the slope of the shooting distance to the basin of the water basin.

On the front of the moving direction, there was a vehicle stopped in accordance with the vehicle stop signal, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle on the front direction by checking the traffic situation well.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to perform his duty at the time of Jeonju, and operated by the victim C (the age of 52) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the same direction as that of the defendant's running, was driven by the defendant, and due to the shock, the defendant was driving by the front part of the driver's of the above car, and due to the shock, he was driving by the victim E (the age of 43) who was in the atmosphere of the above car while driving by the victim E (the age of 43).

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, parked the said victim C, the said victim G (the 48 years old), and the victim H (the 19 years old) with approximately two weeks of medical treatment, suffered from the injury of fluorites, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim E, while at the same time, the victim C was damaged by the fluor of light c, which requires approximately 929,098 won of repair expenses, such as fluoring exchange, and escaped without taking measures such as aiding the victims, even if the said vehicle owned by the victim C was destroyed by fluoring it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in C and E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis (No. 8 to 11 No. 1 of the evidence list);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow