logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 09. 25. 선고 2014두8537 판결
(심리불속행) 원고의 8년 자경사실을 인정할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2013Nu1285 (Law No. 10, 2014)

Title

(Resceptive Conduct) The plaintiff's self-descriptiveness cannot be recognized for 8 years.

Summary

In light of the fact that the registered domicile is also registered as the cargo company and the location of a construction company, the plaintiff was registered as the representative of several corporations at the time of the transfer of farmland, and that he was unable to submit detailed data concerning self-defence, etc., it is difficult to recognize that he was self-defensing

Related statutes

Article 69 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

2014Du8537 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

KoreaA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Public Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court Decision 2013Nu1285 Decided April 10, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow