logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 07. 10. 선고 2014두5446 판결
(심리불속행) 항공사진 판독결과 일부 농지였던 것으로 보이나 8년 자경사실은 인정할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2013Nu596 (20 December 20, 2014)

Title

(Psychological Incompetence) It shall be deemed as part of the farmland as a result of the aerial photography reading, but it shall not be recognized that the facts of the 8-year self-defense

Summary

(C) In light of the fact that the Plaintiff had been engaged in the repair business of agricultural machinery, it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff had invested more than 1/2 of his own labor power in the instant land, in light of the fact that the Plaintiff had cultivated ornamental trees on other farmland.

Related statutes

Article 69 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

2014Du546 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

leAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Busan District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court Decision 2013Nu596 decided February 20, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the assertion on the grounds of appeal by appellant is clear that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow