The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On March 14, 2018, the Defendant found a vehicle stopped in the victim D(31) on the street above the main point of “C” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and found the vehicle to be stopped in the victim’s D(31). The Defendant is the E-President.

Until P.M. 1 p.m., the vehicle should not be left, and the vehicle should be substituted by the vehicle.

“The damaged person who wishes to explain the situation” refers to “h h h h h h h h h h n

There is no friende.

The phrase “the victim and the victim got off the victim’s vehicle as a vision,” and the victim told “Isk and flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flicks

2. Determination of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement submitted by the defendant, it is clear that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on April 12, 2018, after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.