Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 28, 2017, the Defendant, at around 22:57, made a telephone conversation in the front of the Switzerland, in the direction of 106, as the Busan Western-gu, Busan, with the direction of the vehicle operated by the victim B (S 47). The Defendant obstructed the course of the vehicle operated by the victim B (S , South 47). The Defendant was asked by the victim as to why she would stop the vehicle.
In doing so, the victim was assaulted by cutting down the spath of the victim's spath with a spath by breathing the victim's spath and cutting down the spath.
Judgment
1. Applicable legal provisions: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
2. Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
3. Non-existence of punishment for victims (Submission of written agreements on June 26, 2017);
4. Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;