The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported on April 4, 2016, 06:10, the victim B (18 taxes) and his/her activities in front of the building in Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, about 139-ro 139-ro; and (b) told the victim that “I will see why I would see, be blick, be blick, and Ga.” However, the Defendant assaulted the victim by making the victim blick by mixing the victim with his/her complaint, stating that “I will blick blick, which does not flick,” and blick the victim’s left side of the victim’s building at one time.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is apparent that the victim withdraws his wish to punish the Defendant, and thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.