Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on the road in front of the “D convenience store” located in Ansan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si on September 23, 2015; (b) the victim E, who had expressed a desire to have her women’s friend, expressed a desire to do so.
For the reason that he/she and interfered with the word "," he/she raised a challenge against the victim's head, and committed violence against the victim by taking the victim's face one time as drinking.
2. The judgment is the case that falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the victim's legal statement, it is obvious that the victim withdrawn his or her rare expression that he or she wishes to punish the defendant on June 24, 2016, after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.