logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.24 2014가단5231760
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 16, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by three master cancers in the upper part of the lower part and the lower part of the first part of the operation, which was conducted by the Defendant to the Tol University Seoul Mother Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

On November 20, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed an diversary cryption to the Plaintiff by using the dypical dypical dypical dypical dypical dypical dypical dypical dypical dyp

(hereinafter referred to as “the primary surgery”). As a result of the observation of the blood side on the same day, the blood side was observed and the blood transfusion on the part of the workplace was observed, but the above symptoms were stable after the blood transfusion was de facto.

On November 23, 2012, when the color color of the exhaust pipe inserted on the Plaintiff’s surgery changed, and the leakage of the gramconium took place, treatment such as anti-biological medication and the addition of the meconium was conducted, but the Plaintiff showed her opinion of dypology due to typineal disease in the book of 10cm upper upper part of the gramconium.

B. On November 30, 2012, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital, following the second surgery, added the said dypology to the said dypology and carried out the dypical dypology.

(hereinafter referred to as "the second operation"). After the second operation, the color color of the exhaust pipe has changed into a color, and the anti-biological treatment was performed in order to prevent any leakage of the resistant parts, but a serious dysium was confirmed around the fysium.

C. After the third surgery, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital decided on the emergency operation on December 6, 2012, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital performed the diversary surgery and the permanent fluorary surgery after the laging surgery and the lag restoration surgery on the ground that the lag was serious infection in the vicinity of the surgery and that the lag was changed from the lag to the 15cm upper part of the lag.

hereinafter referred to as "third operation".

(D) At present, the Plaintiff’s current status is the state of permanent failure due to the alcohol for the creation of permanent partnership (inhuman airport). [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap 1-3 evidence, Eul 1 evidence (including the entire paper number, and the central hospital director).

arrow